I can see where a simple utilitarian browser approach would be an improvement over the existing library arrangement, for a segment of users. But then wouldn't there still be the burden of deciding which of our collection of DAW's to use? :lol: Image Line solved that. FL Studio is a VST just in case...

As you can see the above DAWs are a click and access to media. Mixcraft fails there. It reminds me of Garage Band. I could have posted more screenshots of DAWs I have. I bought Mixcraft yesterday and I really love how it works. It's very impressive and underrated but this proprietary library really ...

Multiple sample folders options by the end user. Mixcraft needs this.

This is the only DAW out there without a media browser unless I'm missing something. I must be missing something. Who wouldn't just minimize the window and do the browsing in another? Isn't that (essentially) what 'all' the other DAWS do anyway? I must be missing something. -h You are clearly missi...

I would like to see instead of a library but add folders (not import) you can access sounds from other drives. I have separate folders/drive for loops and midis. This is the only DAW out there without a media browser unless I'm missing something.