OK, 32 ins and motorized. I see that in the panel zoom views online. I had a Yamaha AW4416 years ago with motorized faders, was cool for memorizing mix settings and adjustments on the fly. Now we have the automation curves in MX of course. I suppose another possibility is a second larger (IE 32"+) monitor and stick with a MIDI controller with MX's mixer. So many options. I still remember my first 4 track cassette portastudio...!!!
GovernmentMule - interesting option, looking at this now also!
Seriously, I appreciate the replies and ideas! Now for the scary part - no trashing intended or implied here --- "Behringer" . Although in fairness I have had decent luck with some of their stuff in the past.
Mike
MX9 - mixer or replace AI opinions
Moderators: Acoustica Greg, Acoustica Chris, Acoustica Eric, Acoustica Dan, rsaintjohn
Re: MX9 - mixer or replace AI opinions
MX10.5 Pro Studio B 586. Presonus 1818vsl AI, Dell XPS 8930 Core I9-9900 3.10 GHz, Windows 10 Pro 64-bit, 64-GB RAM, Nvidia GeForce 2060, 1 and 2 TB SSD’s + 1 and 2 TB spinner sata’s, cookies and coffee.
-
- Posts: 376
- Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 3:58 pm
Re: MX9 - mixer or replace AI opinions
Yes, Behringer did have an awful quality control problem back in the day but they have upped their game in the last decade. I think they are a godsend for the music hobbyist with their pricing and availability of products now.MikeDVI wrote: ↑Sat Feb 29, 2020 6:51 pm
GovernmentMule - interesting option, looking at this now also!
Seriously, I appreciate the replies and ideas! Now for the scary part - no trashing intended or implied here --- "Behringer" . Although in fairness I have had decent luck with some of their stuff in the past.
Mike
I bought a Mackie MCU controller before the X-Touch came out. But I'm seriously considering selling it and buying an X-Touch so I can have a setup like in this video so I can control my DAW and the XR18 together.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjM2qlulD-4