Master track's default position?

[Anorax]

Should the master track automatically default to the bottom, or is it intended to be moved around? I only ask because if you add the master track, it appears at the bottom, but you can add tracks after it. You can then remove and re-add the master track, and it again appears at the bottom instead of remembering its past position.

I guess the question is this currently a appreciable default behavior, or is there some other preferable behavior?

Not adding this to the bug tracker because I don't know if it's really a bug or not, and I'm more or less looking for input on what kind of preferred behavior users should expect.

[Acoustica Greg]

Hi,

Good question! People might like the flexibility of putting the master track anywhere, I suppose.

Greg

[jlouvar]

FWIW: I like the Master Track always on the bottom.

[Acoustica Greg]

Hi,

I suppose that could be a feature request: sink the master track to the bottom!

Greg

[Mark Bliss]

I only occasionally enable it in the arranger view, but personally I would vote for a default that opens it on the bottom when enabled, but retaining the ability to re-locate it where one wishes.

*though I cant imagine wanting it anywhere else..... But it could happen!

But on the other hand, sub mixes and sends should open immediately below a selected track IMO.

[jlouvar]

I only occasionally enable it in the arranger view, but personally I would vote for a default that opens it on the bottom when enabled, but retaining the ability to re-locate it where one wishes.

*though I cant imagine wanting it anywhere else..... But it could happen! 8)bit

But on the other hand, sub mixes and sends should open immediately below a selected track IMO.

I like and agree with this.