I've been doing research on new DAWs I could try to switch to and I have to say that the Acoustica team have made a really competitive product. They've cut down the amount of clicks and clutter on almost every feature I see in other DAWs. I have no clue why recording audio takes so much work in other DAWs.
Mixcraft doesn't have every feature, but dammit if it doesn't have a ton of them already well implemented.
1st World Problems
Moderators: Acoustica Greg, Acoustica Eric, Acoustica Dan, rsaintjohn
-
- Posts: 281
- Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:07 pm
- Location: Southern New England
Re: 1st World Problems
i have never tried another DAW so that is good to hear.
10.5 Pro studio build 596
Dell XPS i7-10700 2.9Ghz
48 GB RAM
Windows 10
Dell XPS i7-10700 2.9Ghz
48 GB RAM
Windows 10
-
- Posts: 1011
- Joined: Sat Sep 16, 2017 3:09 pm
Re: 1st World Problems
Ive messed around a bit with logic (in the past) , ardour, reaper, and cakewalk. Audacity too, though i dont look at audacity as a full on daw.
Mixcraft to me is the most intuitive and the functuons are easy to find. Not burried in endless menus and submenus or modes
Mixcraft to me is the most intuitive and the functuons are easy to find. Not burried in endless menus and submenus or modes
- Northfield.Lenox
- Posts: 226
- Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2016 8:23 am
- Location: Manitoba Canada
- Contact:
Re: 1st World Problems
I started a trial version of BITWIG, as I started watching a few tutorials about it, it seems to be quite good. But, then I thought . . why make my life any more complicated than it needs to be? So I won't be purchasing it after the trial is over and will stick with Mixcraft...