Which Version

Support and feedback for Acoustica's Mixcraft audio mixing software.

Moderators: Acoustica Greg, Acoustica Eric, Acoustica Dan, rsaintjohn

Studio 919
Posts: 290
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2011 8:54 am
Location: Middle Georgia, USA

Re: Which Version

Post by Studio 919 »

Hey asimmd,

Like clavguy said, extra plug-ins, for example, Isotope Mastering Essentials, and Acoustica 31 band eq. I wanted all the toys and have not been disappointed. Then again, I was starting from scratch - I didn't have a library of existing plug-ins that I had used in other daws.

Also, earlier in this thread, Acoustica Greg posted a link to the comparison chart you might want to look at.

I might also add that this forum is the BEST. The guys at Acoustica, as well as the regulars in here are always ready to answer questions and offer tips and information. :D

Again, welcome aboard.

Barry
No matter where you go, there you are.

Image
User avatar
Mark Bliss
Posts: 7313
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2012 3:59 pm
Location: Out there

Re: Which Version

Post by Mark Bliss »

clavguy wrote:
asimmd wrote:Don't let the age fool you I'm no doddering idiot............yet.LoL
Alan
But a perfect candidate for the Mixcraft Old Farts Club :mrgreen:
asimmd wrote:That's for me - Where do I sign up?

Alan
I think you were automatically inducted when you wrote that sentence Alan. Welcome to the family!

Personally I upgraded to the pro version back when the pro version was first created I think.....
Reasons? Mostly so I had access to all the additional plugs to test them out and see if I needed them. Turns out, mostly not. A few exceptions. For instance, I have gotten a lot of use out of the TB Parametric EQ over time, But recently purchased a third party bundle that includes a potential replacement. Time will tell, preferences develop and change over time don't they?

I have been slowly phasing in some choice Waves selections lately. Which do you have? I crave some UAD stuff and DSP technology, but I cant get too carried away. Yet. 8)
Stay in tune, Mark

My SOUNDCLOUD Page
asimmd
Posts: 39
Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2015 4:15 am
Location: Preston UK

Re: Which Version

Post by asimmd »

HI Mark

To answer the question which plugins do I have here is a list of the Waves and Universal Audio.
Waves
RS56
Puigchild
Tape Tubes and Transistors bundle.

Universal Audio

Roland RE201 Echo
UAD Teletronix LA-2A
UA 1176
UA Pultec Pro
Real Verb Pro
Pultec EQP-1A
UA CS1
Cambridge EQ

I also have Softube Abbey Road Brilliance Pack
Fabfilter Q2
And various others I have collected over the years.

Alan
Image
User avatar
Mark Bliss
Posts: 7313
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2012 3:59 pm
Location: Out there

Re: Which Version

Post by Mark Bliss »

Good signs of a picky mixer who is into the details.

Prime flavors of compressor and EQ emulations, and a high quality reverb.
I'm eager to hear some of your work now Alan!

Fabfilter Pro-Q is on my short list. Tried it out after seeing it used in some tut's. Nice features.

My evolving list includes many impulse buys and some cases of "sales I just couldn't resist" I guess. :D

Waves:
C1
Center
Doubler
Eddie Kramer GT
GTR3
MannyM Reverb
One Knob Louder
Renaissance bass
R. Comp
R. Axx
R. Vox
R. EQ
Super Tap Delay
Vocal Rider

Other assorted including:

TRacks Classic
iZotopes Nectar essentials

And a bunch more odds and ends.

Now if I could just learn to make the most of some of them. 8)

*Note to anyone who reads this, I am not advocating that anyone needs all this particular stuff, or that the stock MC plugs aren't useful. I believe its best to find what sounds good to you and has an interface you can become comfortable using and I believe its best to get to know how to use your choices well.
But options are fun.......
Stay in tune, Mark

My SOUNDCLOUD Page
asimmd
Posts: 39
Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2015 4:15 am
Location: Preston UK

Re: Which Version

Post by asimmd »

Hi Mark
Thanks you are not that far behind and as you say a few plugins used well is
no match for a ton of plugins used badly.

My music is instrumental a lot of Shadows stuff but I play anything that makes
a good instrumental.

My main guitar is a Fender C/S NOS56 Vox AC15 amp and various echoes.

Perhaps when I have recorded something using Mixcraft I will be allowed to
post something but it would not be fair to do that now.

Alan
Image
martinweeks
Posts: 162
Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2014 1:54 pm

Re: Which Version

Post by martinweeks »

Studio 919 wrote:Hi asimmd, welcome aboard. I'm 63 years old and love how easy it is to lay down tracks with Mixcraft. Either version will be a pleasure to work with. Personally, I use the Pro Studio version.

Barry
Since when is 63 considered "old?"
Studio 919
Posts: 290
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2011 8:54 am
Location: Middle Georgia, USA

Re: Which Version

Post by Studio 919 »

Hey martinweeks,

In the original post, asimmd stated that he is 68 years old. In my reply, I stated that I am 63 attempting to reassure asimmd that he is not the only "mature" individual in here.

You are correct, 63 is not old; neither is 68. The way I see it, I have turned 21 on 3 occasions. :lol:

Barry
No matter where you go, there you are.

Image
User avatar
outteh
Posts: 3767
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2012 12:23 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

Re: Which Version

Post by outteh »

It's no longer called "old" now it's "seasoned" ! :lol:
User avatar
Rolling Estonian
Posts: 2055
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:42 am
Location: MD/DC

Re: Which Version

Post by Rolling Estonian »

outteh wrote:It's no longer called "old" now it's "seasoned" ! :lol:
I like Chronically Refined.

M
User avatar
outteh
Posts: 3767
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2012 12:23 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

Re: Which Version

Post by outteh »

Rolling Estonian wrote:
outteh wrote:It's no longer called "old" now it's "seasoned" ! :lol:
I like Chronically Refined.

M

:D :D :D :D
User avatar
Rolling Estonian
Posts: 2055
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:42 am
Location: MD/DC

Re: Which Version

Post by Rolling Estonian »

Or did I mean chronologically?

:mrgreen:

M
Post Reply