Meters and levels

Support and feedback for Acoustica's Mixcraft audio mixing software.

Moderators: Acoustica Greg, Acoustica Eric, Acoustica Dan, rsaintjohn

Post Reply
Yellowcake
Posts: 84
Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2017 5:34 pm

Meters and levels

Post by Yellowcake »

Hi

I seem to be asking a lot of questions at the moment. Learning new software is always a bit problematic.

I'm a bit confused about the meters available in Mixcraft. Please see attached screendump. I'm simply plugging my bass guitar into my interface and trying to set up levels. There seems to be three different meters available and they all seem to display different things.

When setting up basic track levels, what meter should I be using? What sort of dB levels do you tend to use?

Many thanks, Dave
Attachments
snip.JPG
snip.JPG (131.78 KiB) Viewed 4539 times
User avatar
Mark Bliss
Posts: 7313
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2012 3:59 pm
Location: Out there

Re: Meters and levels

Post by Mark Bliss »

You could use either of the track meter examples on the left side of your image.

I would target -18 (Average or RMS, not peak) in most cases, unless it is a very dynamic signal with high peaks. Typically that should result in peaks in roughly the -12 range. There's generally no need to record at any higher level than that.
Recording level.png
Recording level.png (399.08 KiB) Viewed 4519 times
More precise advise would lead us to discussing third party meter use and more specific recording advice would vary depending on your sound card or interface, driver used, etc.
Stay in tune, Mark

My SOUNDCLOUD Page
rrichard63
Posts: 195
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2016 4:14 pm

Re: Meters and levels

Post by rrichard63 »

Mark Bliss wrote: ... more specific recording advice would vary depending on your sound card or interface, driver used, etc.
Specific advice also depends, very importantly, on the style of music you are making.
User avatar
Mark Bliss
Posts: 7313
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2012 3:59 pm
Location: Out there

Re: Meters and levels

Post by Mark Bliss »

Yep. Pretty general answer to a pretty general question.

But its a pretty good starting point. Generally. 8)
Stay in tune, Mark

My SOUNDCLOUD Page
aj113
Posts: 1455
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2010 3:06 pm
Contact:

Re: Meters and levels

Post by aj113 »

Here's what I do:

Ignore all the meters and hit record. Use the realtime waveform that is drawn as your "meter".
bobbyathome
Posts: 21
Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2016 8:16 pm

Re: Meters and levels

Post by bobbyathome »

This is a tough one to generalize. I work exclusively in piano roll - entering notes from sheet music as a hobby. I also almost always use virtual instruments, and only occasionally sampled sound files. Here's what I do: I never touch the "master" meter- I leave it at 0. I start by setting all the tracks automation volume to whatever the sheet music calls for (-30 for ppp, up to 0 for fff. Then, in the "mixer" window, all instrument tracks are set to -18 to begin. After I have notes for a bar or few entered, I adjust each track up (or infrequently down) because some instruments are too quiet in relation to the other instruments.

This leaves plenty of "headroom" for added effects, and necessary adjustments as I go along. Sometimes you just need that snare louder, or that French horn to really soar. Just remember, you can always raise the volume level for individual instruments, but if you get too far into a work and find everything red-lining it's a pain to go back and find that headroom. And if you get to the end and decide the whole thing needs some compression you might melt your headset (and ears).

Experiment and find your own method. Trust what you are hearing and have fun.
Yellowcake
Posts: 84
Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2017 5:34 pm

Re: Meters and levels

Post by Yellowcake »

[quote="Mark Bliss"]You could use either of the track meter examples on the left side of your image.

Thank you Mark. Silly question but should both of the meters read the same ie. are they ‘mirrors’ of each other? I’m writing this in bed so I can’t remember the specific example but I’m sure they were reading differently. Is this even possible? Are they monitoring the same input?

Thanks again

Dave
User avatar
Mark Bliss
Posts: 7313
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2012 3:59 pm
Location: Out there

Re: Meters and levels

Post by Mark Bliss »

Hi Dave.

Its the same but since the meters are quite different it's hard to compare. The meter in the arranger view is very "course" and a bit generic IMO, while the meter in the mixer view is a bit more "detailed" so to speak. Especially if expanded in the undocked view.
Either way, if you really want to get into precise metering, you will want to explore third party options. Based on the nature of your question though, it is probably purely optional. I'm a measurement guy with a collection of micrometers etc in my toolbox(es). 8)
Stay in tune, Mark

My SOUNDCLOUD Page
User avatar
TrevsAudio
Posts: 3669
Joined: Sun May 06, 2012 1:59 am
Location: Rhode Island

Re: Meters and levels

Post by TrevsAudio »

Yep, agree with Mark - but there will always be differing opinions.

I always shoot for a signal between -18 with peaks at -12. That you should get by adjusting the input volume on your interface, leaving the track set at unity.

One of my only gripes with Mixcraft - previous versions had readouts on the track, but now you have to have the mixer open to see the actual levels.
Old Dudes Rock!
Trevor
OFC™ Founding Member
Dell 3050 SSF i3, 32gig RAM; MX 8, 9 and 10.5 Pro; Win 11 Pro
Focusrite 2i2; Sennheiser HD650 cans

Sample Projects: https://soundcloud.com/trevs_audio
YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@trevsaudio
Post Reply