Re: Mixer channels
Posted: Fri May 25, 2018 7:58 pm
Dave, I would point out that many of the things suggested have been previously discussed, and already officially logged as future suggestions. That is why I was intentionally vague about a few of the details in my previous reply.
Also, I would add that it has been my experience and observation over an extended time with Mixcraft and Acoustica in general, that they are very interested in this kind of input and "listening".
But at the same time, they seem to very carefully consider the balance between the features and functions as they develop, and pay a lot of attention to the balance between those functions and features, and maintaining a level of ease of use and an intuitive interface.
I don't think that's a bad thing. And I encourage the expression of ideas for improvements, as well as features seen elsewhere that might be worth considering.
They are very unlikely to just throw a bunch of stuff into the code and say "good enough". The unfortunate result is that sometimes changes come a bit slower than we would like. But the product wouldn't likely have some of the strengths we enjoy otherwise.
I think a well explained suggestion and discussion has been part of many a major improvement with this product every step of the way.
And I hope that a more configurable mixer with some additional embedded mixing tools will in time be added to that list.
Good suggestion IMO.
Also, I would add that it has been my experience and observation over an extended time with Mixcraft and Acoustica in general, that they are very interested in this kind of input and "listening".
But at the same time, they seem to very carefully consider the balance between the features and functions as they develop, and pay a lot of attention to the balance between those functions and features, and maintaining a level of ease of use and an intuitive interface.
I don't think that's a bad thing. And I encourage the expression of ideas for improvements, as well as features seen elsewhere that might be worth considering.
They are very unlikely to just throw a bunch of stuff into the code and say "good enough". The unfortunate result is that sometimes changes come a bit slower than we would like. But the product wouldn't likely have some of the strengths we enjoy otherwise.
I think a well explained suggestion and discussion has been part of many a major improvement with this product every step of the way.
And I hope that a more configurable mixer with some additional embedded mixing tools will in time be added to that list.
Good suggestion IMO.