This is what you've been saying. Then I was indeed misunderstanding your point....The daw uses the measurements to automatically adjust to compensate for this and the results should reflect this when you overdubs audio.
I couldn't fathom how you could think there could possibly be a .7ms latency in a system where the minimum latency was already 2.7ms. It is just physically not possible. You're talking about a computation by the DAW to adjust the position of the recording backwards by N number of milliseconds based on the true latency reading of the audio driver. ...and the ability to turn on and off such functionality. I didn't think you were talking about delay compensation but were saying that Mixcraft had higher latency than any other DAW (which isn't true).
Micraft has this unless you're talking about something else:Mixcraft, Waveform and Harrison don’t seem to have the ASIO information or adjustments.